Showing posts with label qualinet. Show all posts
Showing posts with label qualinet. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 15, 2020

QUALINET White Paper on Definitions of Immersive Media Experience (IMEx)

QUALINET announces its recent White Paper on Definitions of Immersive Media Experience (IMEx).

It is online available here https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.07032 for free.

With the coming of age of virtual/augmented reality and interactive media, numerous definitions, frameworks, and models of immersion have emerged across different fields ranging from computer graphics to literary works. Immersion is oftentimes used interchangeably with presence as both concepts are closely related. However, there are noticeable interdisciplinary differences regarding definitions, scope, and constituents that are required to be addressed so that a coherent understanding of the concepts can be achieved. Such consensus is vital for paving the directionality of the future of immersive media experiences (IMEx) and all related matters.

The aim of this white paper is to provide a survey of definitions of immersion and presence which leads to a definition of immersive media experience (IMEx). The Quality of Experience (QoE) for immersive media is described by establishing a relationship between the concepts of QoE and IMEx followed by application areas of immersive media experience. Influencing factors on immersive media experience are elaborated as well as the assessment of immersive media experience. Finally, standardization activities related to IMEx are highlighted and the white paper is concluded with an outlook related to future developments. 

This White Paper is a contribution by QUALINET, the European Network on Quality of Experience in Multimedia Systems and Services (http://www.qualinet.eu/) to the discussions related to Immersive Media Experience (IMEx). It is motivated by the need for definitions around this term to foster a deeper understanding of ideas and concepts originating from multidisciplinary groups but with a joint interest in multimedia experiences. Thus, this white paper has been created mainly with such multimedia experiences in mind but may be also used beyond.

The QUALINET community aims at extending the notion of network-centric Quality of Service (QoS) in multimedia systems, by relying on the concept of Quality of Experience (QoE). The main scientific objective is the development of methodologies for subjective and objective quality metrics taking into account current and new trends in multimedia communication systems as witnessed by the appearance of new types of content and interactions. QUALINET (2010-2014 as COST Action IC1003) meets once a year collocated with QoMEX (http://qomex.org/) to coordinate its activities around 4 Working Groups (WGs): (i) research, (ii) standardization, (iii) training, and (iv) innovation.

List of Authors and Contributors
Andrew Perkis (andrew.perkis@ntnu.no, editor), Christian Timmerer (christian.timmerer@itec.uni-klu.ac.at, editor), Sabina Baraković, Jasmina Baraković Husić, Søren Bech, Sebastian Bosse, Jean Botev, Kjell Brunnström, Luis Cruz, Katrien De Moor, Andrea de Polo Saibanti, Wouter Durnez, Sebastian Egger-Lampl, Ulrich Engelke, Tiago H. Falk, Jesús Gutiérrez, Asim Hameed, Andrew Hines, Tanja Kojic, Dragan Kukolj, Eirini Liotou, Dragorad Milovanovic, Sebastian Möller, Niall Murray, Babak Naderi, Manuela Pereira, Stuart Perry, Antonio Pinheiro, Andres Pinilla, Alexander Raake, Sarvesh Rajesh Agrawal, Ulrich Reiter, Rafael Rodrigues, Raimund Schatz, Peter Schelkens, Steven Schmidt, Saeed Shafiee Sabet, Ashutosh Singla, Lea Skorin-Kapov, Mirko Suznjevic, Stefan Uhrig, Sara Vlahović, Jan-Niklas Voigt- Antons, Saman Zadtootaghaj.

How to reference this white paper
Perkis, A., Timmerer, C., et al., “QUALINET White Paper
on Definitions of Immersive Media Experience (IMEx)”, European Network on Quality of Experience in Multimedia Systems and Services, 14th QUALINET meeting (online), May 25, 2020.

Alternatively, you may export the citation from arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.07032.

Tuesday, June 4, 2019

QUALINET Online Lecture: On The Privacy Preserving Modelling for QoE

Presenters: Selim Ickin and Jörgen Gustafsson, Ericsson Research
When: 21 June, 2019 - 11:00-12:00 CEST

Abstract:
Machine Learning models in the area of QoE potentially suffer from over-fitting due to limitations including low data volume, and participant profile. This might prevent models being generic if the QoE ML problem is not well formulated, hence these trained models might have risk of performing unexpectedly when tested outside the experimented population. One reason for the limited datasets, which is referred as QoE data lakes, is due to the fact that often these datasets potentially contain user sensitive information, and are only collected throughout expensive user studies with special user consent. Thus, sharing of datasets amongst researchers has been challenging. In this talk, we will discuss on a few state of the art privacy preserving machine learning training techniques that potentially enables sharing of learned knowledge amongst different small data lakes.

Sunday, March 25, 2018

IEEE MIPR'18: Automated Objective and Subjective Evaluation of HTTP Adaptive Streaming Systems

Automated Objective and Subjective Evaluation of HTTP Adaptive Streaming Systems

Christian Timmerer (Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt / Bitmovin), Anatoliy Zabrovskiy (Petrozavodsk State University / Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt), and Ali C. Begen (Ozyegin University / Networked Media)

Invited paper at IEEE MIPR 2018

PDF available here (coming soon)

Abstract: Streaming audio and video content currently accounts for the majority of the internet traffic and is typically deployed over the top of the existing infrastructure. We are facing the challenge of a plethora of media players and adaptation algorithms showing different behavior but lack a common framework for both objective and subjective evaluation of such systems. This paper aims to close this gap by (i) proposing such a framework, (ii) describing its architecture, (iii) providing an example evaluation, (iv) and discussing open issues.

Slides:

Tuesday, June 6, 2017

QoMEX'17 Review: Down the Rabbit Hole - Immersive Experience

During QoMEX 2017 in Erfurt, Germany we had a special session entitled "Down the Rabbit Hole" which I have introduced here already. The papers of the special session will appear soon in IEEEXplore but together with my co-organizers of this special session -- Raimund Schatz and Judith Redi -- we also wanted to run the special session in a special way. Therefore, we asked authors to prepare concise and thought-provoking paper presentations (~15min incl. Q&A -- paper title, presenter, picture, key words below) to save some time for a panel discussion. Surprisingly, it worked very well and the special session turned out to be worthwhile and informative. In order to keep the audience connected and involved we posted a single slide of all panelists (i.e., paper presenters) which was shown all the time (see below).


The discussion was centered around the question "what is your understanding of a fully immersive experience" which revealed interesting aspects and finally resulted in the main challenge how to quantify immersive experience. In this context, Mr. T. (only those who've been at QoMEX and in this session know why he is called Mr. T. -- join us next time and we will explain you what's behind) raised an interesting idea to interpret the Turing test for immersive experience. That is, fully or truly immersive experience is achieved if a human is no longer aware that she/he actually interacts with cyber-physical systems. I think this statement sets the bar (high) but definitely worth to consider.

Finally, I'd like to thank all presenters/panelists for an amazing special session at QoMEX'17 but the journey is not yet over. I'll be attending ACM MMSys and IEEE ICME presenting/discussing various aspects of immersive experiences; also at the MPEG meeting in Torino which will be dedicated to standardization aspects of immersive experiences.

Also big big thanks to the conference organizers, the team around the general chair Alexander Raake
(TU Ilmenau, Germany), for hosting such a wonderful event! Hope seeing you all next year for QoMEX 2018.

Feel free to test/play around with Bitmovin solutions for VR/360-degree streaming and if you have a RICOH THETA S check out my blog post how to setup a live streaming session.

Come and join us on the journey down the rabbit hole which eventually will lead to wonderland.




Friday, May 19, 2017

QoMEX'17 Special Session 2: Down the Rabbit Hole – General Aspects of VR and the Immersion Experience


QoMEX 2017
May 31 – June 2, 2017 in Erfurt, Germany


Picture from http://www.chalquist.com/fantastophobia.html

Chairs

  • Raimund Schatz, Austrian Institute of Technology (AIT), Austria
  • Christian Timmerer, Alpen-Adria-Universität (AAU) Klagenfurt, Austria
  • Judith Redi, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands

Motivation

Currently, we witness a proliferation of new products and applications based on immersive media technologies – exemplified best by the current “VR hype” causing a flurry of new devices and applications to hit the market place. The potential of immersive media is large, however, investigation and application of QoE in this context is still in its infancy as many issues are not yet understood. Consequently, the multimedia-quality community faces new, rapidly moving research targets, resulting in the following overarching questions:
  • What is the interplay between concepts like Immersion, Presence, Interactivity, Multimedia Quality and User Experience in the context of emerging immersive applications and technologies?
  • What should be the role of QoE in this domain?
  • How to characterize, assess, model and manage QoE for immersive media-rich applications?
This special session aims to bring together researchers and practitioners to present and discuss quality-related issues and topics in the field of immersive media. The goal is to highlight the major challenges the multimedia quality community should target in this dynamically evolving domain and identify ways forward to addressing them effectively.

All QoMEX'17 special sessions can be found here.

Schedule & Format

Thursday, June 1, 2017, 13:00 -- 15:00
  1. Chenyan Zhang, Andrew Perkis and Sebastian Arndt, Spatial Immersion versus Emotional Immersion, Which is More Immersive?
  2. Conor Keighrey, Ronan Flynn, Siobhan Murray and Niall Murray, A QoE Evaluation of Augmented and Immersive Virtual Reality Speech & Language Assessment Applications 
  3. Raimund Schatz, Andreas Sackl, Christian Timmerer and Bruno Gardlo, Towards Subjective Quality of Experience Assessment for Omnidirectional Video Streaming
  4. Ashutosh Singla, Stephan Fremerey, Werner Robitza and Alexander Raake, Measuring and Comparing QoE and Simulator Sickness of Omnidirectional Videos in Different Head Mounted Displays
  5. Yashas Rai, Patrick Le Callet and Philippe Guillotel, Which saliency weighting for omni directional image quality assessment?
  6. Evgeniy Upenik, Martin Rerabek and Touradj Ebrahimi, On the Performance of Objective Metrics for Omnidirectional Visual Content
The special session format will be as follows:
  • 15min slots per presentation (12-13min talk, 1min for 1 question, 1-2 min time for speaker change)
  • 30min for panel discussion

Panel Discussion

For the panel discussion, our aim is to address the following questions:
  1. What is your understanding of a fully immersive experience (provide a definition or propose keywords to characterize immersive experiences)?
  2. Which aspects should the QoMEX community focus on?
  3. What can we learn and which knowledge can we re-use from the 3D and HDR research experiences?
... and we'd like to solicit also input from the community at large. Therefore, we setup a shared Google doc which is available here, asking for YOUR input: http://bit.ly/QoMEXSpS2.

Come and join us on the journey down the rabbit hole which eventually will lead to wonderland.

Monday, May 8, 2017

Joint QUALINET-VQEG team on Immersive Media (JQVIM)

QUALINET and VQEG have an ambition to increase the collaboration between the organizations. As a pilot effort we are hereby proposing a Joint Qualinet-VQEG team on Immersive Media (JQVIM). The actual collaboration will be between the Task Force: "Immersive Media Experiences (IMEx)" of Qualinet and the Working Group "Immersive Media Group (IMG)" of VQEG.

The initial goals for JQVIM are:
  • Collecting and producing open source immersive media content and data set
  • Establishing and recommending best practices and guidelines
  • Collecting and producing open source immersive media tools
  • Survey of standardisation activities
Anybody who's interested joining this effort, please contact me. Interestingly, this effort is related to my previous post where the VR Industry Forum (VRIF) calls for VR360 Content and also MPEG established an Ad-Hoc Group (AhG) on Immersive Media Quality Evaluation with similar mandates.

Thursday, April 24, 2014

Quality of Experience: Advanced Concepts, Applications, and Methods

Quality of Experience
Advanced Concepts, Applications, and Methods

Sebastian Möller and Alexander Raake (Eds.)

  • Develops and applies the definition of Quality of Experience in telecommunication services
  • Includes examples and guidelines for many fields of applications
  • Written and Edited by known experts in the field
This pioneering book develops definitions and concepts related to Quality of Experience in the context of multimedia- and telecommunications-related applications, systems and services, and applies these to various fields of communication and media technologies. The editors bring together numerous key-protagonists of the new discipline “Quality of Experience” and combine the state-of-the-art knowledge in one single volume.

The Sensory Experience Lab (SELab) is also having its chapter within this book entitled Sensory Experience: Quality of Experience Beyond Audio-Visual with the abstract as follows:

Abstract: This chapter introduces the concept of Sensory Experience which aims to define the Quality of Experience (QoE) going beyond audio-visual content. In particular, we show how to utilize sensory effects such as ambient light, scent, wind, or vibration as additional dimensions contributing to the quality of the user experience. Therefore, we utilize a standardized representation format for sensory effects that are attached to traditional multimedia resources such as audio, video, and image contents. Sensory effects are rendered on special devices (e.g., fans, lights, motion chair, scent emitter) in synchronization with the traditional multimedia resources and shall stimulate also other senses than hearing and seeing with the intention to increase the Quality of Experience (QoE), in this context referred to as Sensory Experience.

Monday, April 14, 2014

Special Sessions at QoMEX 2014

QoMEX 2014 is inviting submissions to the following special sessions:
The purpose of these special sessions is to complement the regular program with new or emerging topics of particular interest to the community.

The submission deadlines and review process for papers in the special sessions are the same as for regular papers. To submit your contribution to a special session, follow the submission process for regular papers and select the session title as one of the paper’s topics.

Important dates:
  • Submission deadline: May 4, 2014
  • Notification of acceptance: June 15, 2014
  • Camera-ready papers: July 13, 2014
  • Workshop dates: September 18-20, 2014

Monday, March 25, 2013

QUALINET Multimedia Databases

A key for current and future developments in Quality of Experience resides in a rich and internationally recognized database of content of different sorts, and to share such a database with the scientific community at large. The QUALINET Database platform takes the necessary steps to make them accessible to all researchers:

(registration is free of charge)

Currently, the QUALINET database comprises > 170 multimedia databases, based on literature/Internet search and input from QUALINET partner laboratories. They're mostly image (~52) or video datasets (~68), with (~57) or w/o subjective quality rating, special content, e.g. 3D (~23), FV, eyetracking (~21), audio, audiovisual (~8), HDR (~14), and other modalities.

The documentation of the QUALINET databases can be found on the corresponding Wiki page. For an overview, please consult the white paper on QUALINET databases (PDF) and please reference it as follows:
Karel Fliegel, Christian Timmerer, (eds.), “WG4 Databases White Paper v1.5: QUALINET Multimedia Database enabling QoE Evaluations and Benchmarking”, Prague/Klagenfurt, Czech Republic/Austria, Version 1.5, March 2013.

Finally, you're welcome to contribute to this effort, simply send an email to wg4.qualinet@listes.epfl.ch and briefly describe your dataset [to subscribe, send an e-mail (its content is unimportant) to wg4.qualinet-subscribe@listes.epfl.ch, you will receive information to confirm your subscription, and upon the acceptance of the moderator will be included in the mailing-list].

Additionally, you may consider submitting a dataset paper to QoMEX or MMSys which hosts dataset tracks and accepted dataset paper will be automatically included within the QUALINET database.

Friday, February 8, 2013

Colloquium on Quality of Experience in Multimedia Systems and Services [Video, Slides]

With this blog post I'd like to provide the slides from the colloquium on quality of experience in multimedia systems and services, November 23, 2012, 09:00-13:00 Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt, Austria. The following provides an index to the videos and slides of the talks:
Pictures are provided in the Facebook group of QUALINET. The next scientific event sponsored by QUALINET is QoMEX'13 followed by PQS'13.

Friday, November 9, 2012

Colloquium on Quality of Experience in Multimedia Systems and Services


November 23, 2012, 09:00-13:00
Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt, Austria
Seminar Room of Lakeside Labs
Chair: Christian Timmerer



Multimedia is a ubiquitous part of modern life; content is delivered to a wide variety of devices both fixed and mobile, the consumption environment can vary dramatically, and users increasingly demand fulfilling interaction with their media. Evaluation, both objective and subjective, of separate audio, video, or image content is well established, but there are substantial challenges in assessing users’ experiences of mixed content. This is exacerbated by the diversity of devices, interfaces, consumption environments, and content prevalent in today’s market. Increasingly, evaluation approaches must include psychological, perceptual, and contextual dimensions to truly represent and measure the users’ experiences. Understanding and modelling how users react to and perceive content and applications will inform and improve new applications and lead to better user experiences.

In this context the Förderverein Technische Fakultät and COST Action IC1003 QUALINET invites interested parties, specifically researchers, practitioners, and students to the Colloquium on Quality of Experience in Multimedia Systems and Services. Additionally, the colloquium will hold as part of the research topic "Human Centered Computing and Design" established at he Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt.

We are happy to announce the program as follows with distinguished speakers who are all in leading positions of the COST Action IC1003 QUALINET.

Program

09:00-09:15: Welcome notice and introduction

09:15-10:00: Keynote on "Quality of Experience: Past, Present and Future trends" by Touradj Ebrahimi, EPFL

10:00-10:30: Quality Prediction for Speech-based Telecommunication Services by Sebastian Möller, Quality and usability lab, Telekom Innovation Labs, TU Berlin

10:30-11:00: Quality of Experience of 3DTV and Beyond by Patrick Le Callet, Univ. of Nantes

11:00-11:15: Coffee break

11:15-11:45: Influence of Chromatic Information on QoE by Antonio Pinheiro, U.B.I., Portugal

11:45-12:15: Bitstream and hybrid-based video quality assessment for IPTV monitoring by Savvas Argyropoulos, Telekom Innovation Labs, TU Berlin

12:15-12:45: Machine Learning for objective QoE assessment: Science, Myths and a look to the future by Judith Redi, TU Delft.

12:45-13:15: Overview of Qualinet multimedia databases by Karel Fliegel, Czech Technical University in Prague

13:15: Closing and lunch

Registration
The registration to this colloquium is free of charge and includes workshop attendance, coffee break, and lunch. However, you are required to send an email to Melissa.Aichholzer@aau.at (cc: christian.timmerer@itec.aau.at).

Location
Lakeside Labs with detailed location information incl. nearby hotels here. Additionally, a Google map with the most important point of interests can be found here.

Related links:



Abstracts and biographies of distinguished speakers



Titel: Quality of Experience : Past, Present and Future Trends
Presenter: Touradj Ebrahimi - EPFL

Abstract: With recent progress in networks, devices and interfaces, the traditional ways media has been produced, distributed and consumed have gone through major changes. This paradigm shift is expected to continue, giving birth to new products, services and business models, well beyond those implemented or even imagined today. One constant in all this change is the continuing pursuit of higher, richer and better user experience. Quality of Experience is believed by many to provide the right framework to achieve this goal. 
This talk will start by providing a historical perspective of quality and how it has been evaluated in conventional and even current multimedia systems. We will then discuss different definitions of Quality of Experience and some of the models based on such definitions. The talk will then provide a number of illustrative examples of QoE definitions and models in concrete situations, namely, mobile 3D and mobile media consumption. We will then conclude with a discussion on majors trends and challenges in QoE. 

CV: Touradj Ebrahimi is currently Professor at EPFL heading its Multimedia Signal Processing Group. He is also adjunct Professor with the Center of Quantifiable Quality of Service at Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU). In 2001, he was the first to suggest the notion of Quality of Experience (QoE) be used in multimedia communication systems, and since has produced more than 50 publications on this topic. Prof. Ebrahimi is a co-founder of the International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX), and serves as the chair of the European COST Action IC1003 (Qualinet), on quality of experience in multimedia systems and services. His other research interests include still, moving, and 3D image processing and coding, visual information security (rights protection, watermarking, authentication, data integrity, steganography), new media, and human computer interfaces (smart vision, brain computer interface). He is the author or the co-author of more than 200 research publications, and holds 14 patents. Prof. Ebrahimi is a member of IEEE, SPIE, ACM and IS&T.


Titel: Quality Prediction for Speech-based Telecommunication Services
Presenter: Sebastian Möller, Quality and usability lab, Telekom Innovation Labs, TU Berlin

Abstract: Speech-based services come in an ever increasing variety, and it becomes more and more difficult for system designers and service operators to ensure a sufficiently high quality, usability, and finally acceptance of these services. Whereas the ultimate way to measure quality is by asking test users, such empirical tests require a substantial effort in terms of time and money, and are thus commonly limited to an absolute minimum. One way to cope with this problem is to estimate the quality which will be perceived by the user on the basis of physically measurable quantities, such as speech signals, or parameters describing a spoken interaction.

In this talk, we will present approaches for prediction the quality and usability of speech-based services taking three common application examples: (1) Speech transmission services where overall quality as well as individual quality dimensions can be estimated from transmitted and reference speech signals; (2) synthesized-speech services where no reference is available but can be built artificially with the help of prior knowledge; as well as (3) spoken dialogue services where user behavior needs to be predicted, with the help of probabilities and rules. Small examples will underline the usefulness but also the limitations of the currently available approaches.

CV: Sebastian Möller was born in 1968 and studied electrical engineering at the universities of Bochum (Germany), Orléans (France) and Bologna (Italy). From 1994 to 2005, he held the position of a scientific researcher at the Institute of Communication Acoustics (IKA), Ruhr-University Bochum, and worked on speech signal processing, speech technology, communication acoustics, as well as on speech communication quality aspects. Since June 2005, he works at Deutsche Telekom Laboratories, TU Berlin. He was appointed Professor at TU Berlin for the subject "Quality and Usability" in April 2007, and heads the "Quality and Usability Lab" at Telekom Innovation Laboratories.

He received a Doctor-of-Engineering degree at Ruhr-University Bochum in 1999 for his work on the assessment and prediction of speech quality in telecommunications. In 2000, he was a guest scientist at the Institut dalle Molle d'Intélligence Artificielle Perceptive (IDIAP) in Martigny (Switzerland) where he worked on the quality of speech recognition systems. He gained the qualification needed to be a professor (venia legendi) at the Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology at Ruhr-University Bochum in 2004, with a book on the quality of telephone-based spoken dialogue systems. In September 2008, we worked as a Visiting Fellow at MARCS Auditory Laboratories, University of Western Sydney (Australia) on the evaluation of avatars. In November 2011, he was Visiting Professor at the Universidad de Granada (Spain), and from Februar to April 2012 Visiting Professor at the Ben Gurion University of the Negev in Be'er Sheva (Israel). He is currently Adjunct Professor at the University of Canberra (Australia). His most recent book on "Quality Engineering" was published in 2010.

Sebastian Möller was awarded the GEERS prize in 1998 for his interdisciplinary work on the analysis of infant cries for early hearing-impairment detection, the ITG prize of the German Association for Electrical, Electronic & Information Technologies (VDE) in 2001, the Lothar-Cremer prize of the German Acoustical Association (DEGA) in 2003, a Heisenberg fellowship of the German Research Foundation (DFG) in 2005, and the Johann Philipp Reis prize in 2009. Since 1997, he has taken part in the standardization activities of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU-T) on transmission performance of telephone networks and terminals. He is currently acting as a Rapporteur for question Q.8/12.

Titel: Quality of Experience of 3DTV and Beyond
Presenter: Patrick Le Callet, Univ. of Nantes

Abstract: S-3DTV (Stereoscopic-3DTV), HDR (High Dynamic range), 4K are recent considered technologies to improve the viewer experience. Nevertheless, such technologies are really useful only if properly tuned to increase the Quality of Experience (QoE). For instance, S-3DTV (stereoscopic-3DTV) is supposed to provide enhanced depth perception to viewer but might affect other factors of user experience. Subjective assessment is the most direct way to assess quality of experience (QoE). However, conventional assessment methods are not sufficient to evaluate the QoE of S-3DTV. This talk aims to review the challenge of QoE assessment through use cases related to S-3DTV and HDR. Methodologies to evaluate QoE with observers will be discussed, including environment conditions, scales and display characterization.

CV: Patrick LE CALLET is full professor at Ecole polytechnique de l’université de Nantes (Engineer School) in the Electrical Engineering and the Computer Science department where. Since 2006, he is the head of the Image and VideoCommunication lab at CNRS IRCCyN, a group of more than 35 researchers. He is mostly engaged in research dealing with the application of human vision modeling in image and video processing. His current centers of interest are 3D image and video quality assessment, watermarking techniques and visual attention modeling and applications. He is co-author of more than 150 publications and communications and co-inventor of 13 international patents on these topics. He has coordinated and is currently managing for IRCCyN several National or European collaborative research programs representing grants of more than 2,5 million euros. He is serving in VQEG (Video Quality Expert Group) where is co-chairing the "HDR Group" and "3DTV" activities. He is currently serving as associate editor for IEEE transactions on Circuit System and Video Technology, SPIE Journal of Electronic Imaging and SPRINGER EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing.

Title: Influence of Chromatic Information on QoE
Presenter: Antonio Pinheiro, U.B.I., Portugal

Abstract: The low sensibility revealed by humans to the chromatic information is well known since a long time. That fact was always explored in color multimedia systems! In particular, the early analog color TV systems always had a very reduced amount of chromatic information compared with the amount of luminance information. In this talk, an evaluation of the influence of the chromatic information on QoE of still images is presented. For that, a set of images used for testing are represented in the CIE 1976 (L*a*b*) color space because it is partially uniform and highly related with the human perceptual notion of color. After clustering the image colors, a random error of known magnitude is given to each color cluster on the chromatic components a* and b*, keeping L* constant. With this method images are not degraded by artefacts induced by color discontinuities. A calibrated true color system is used for evaluation of the individuals’ sensibility to color changes. Using the Medium Opinion Score the sensibility to color changes was evaluated and further modelled. As expected, a very low sensibility to chromatic changes was revealed. Finally, objective models for chromatic errors are discussed and the relation between the quality and the emotional state of the subjects is considered.

CV: António M. G. Pinheiro is a lecture at U.B.I. (University of Beira Interior), Covilha, Portugal. After graduated in IST, Portugal in 1988 he worked as Assistant Lecture in U.B.I. In 1998 joined the University of Essex, U.K., where, he received the PhD in Electronic Systems Engineering in 2002 under the supervision of Prof. Mohammed Ghanbari. He is a Portuguese representative in the European Union Action COST IC1003, QUALINET – European Network on Quality of Experience in Multimedia Systems and Services and was a Portuguese representative of COST – 292, Semantic Multimodal Analysis of Digital Media. He is also the coordinator of the research Group Electronic and Computer Systems of the Remote Sensing Unit. Antonio Pinheiro has lectured several courses on Signal and Image Processing and on Digital Systems Design and Microprocessors Architectures and Applications.



Title: Bitstream and hybrid-based video quality assessment for IPTV monitoring
Presenter: Savvas Argyropoulos, Telekom Innovation Labs, TU Berlin

Abstract: The proliferation of IPTV services during the last years has necessitated the development of objective video quality assessment methods. It has become evident that network parameters which define the Quality of Service (Qos) are not sufficient to estimate the service quality perceived by the user, typically referred to as Quality of Experience (QoE). This talk will present an objective no-reference bitstream and hybrid video quality assessment method and provide details on the algorithms which are employed to evaluate different types of degradations, such as compression artefacts, packet loss impairments, playback freezing and re-buffering .

CV: Savvas Argyropoulos received the Diploma and Ph.D. degrees in electrical and computer engineering from the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTH), Thessaloniki, Hellas, in 2004 and 2008, respectively. He is currently a research scientist at Deutsche Telekom Innovation Laboratories (T-Labs), in Berlin, Germany. His research interests include video quality assessment, video coding and transmission, distributed source coding, and perceptual video coding.


Title: Machine Learning for objective QoE assessment: Science, Myths and a look to the future
Presenter: Judith Redi, TU Delft

Abstract: Machine learning has been recently shown to be a very promising tool to support automated QoE assessment. Its ability to mimic highly non-linear, complex phenomena, such as user experience and quality judgment, is extremely appealing for the implementation of on-line, accurate QoE control systems. Nevertheless, applying Machine Learning to QoE is an high risk, high gain approach: if misused, it can lead to poorly flexible and unreliable systems. Key to the attainment of all the gain without risks is a profound understanding of the advantages and limitations that characterize learning machines. Even more important is a strong knowledge of the phenomenon to be mimicked, that is, the user experience.
In this talk, theoretical background, applicative tips and practical examples will be reviewed, with the aim of drawing guidelines for the successful application of Machine Learning to objective QoE assessment.

CV: Judith Redi is Assistant Professor at Delft University of Technology, department of Intelligent Systems, since 2010. She obtained her PhD from the University of Genoa (Italy) in 2010, with a thesis on learning machines for objective image quality assessment, final result of a project on visual quality in displays funded by Philips research. After receiving the award for the best ICT thesis from University of Genoa, she worked as a Post-Doc at Eurecom (France) focusing on image analysis and computer vision. At TU Delft, she works on image and video understanding towards the maximization of the quality of multimedia experiences, for which she was awarded an NWO Veni grant in 2012. She is coordinator of the Qualinet (COST IC1003) Industrial Forum and Management Committee member for the Qualinet COST action.


Title: Overview of Qualinet multimedia databases
Presenter: Karel Fliegel, Czech Technical University in Prague

Abstract: Success of current and future developments in QoE largely depends on availability of proper multimedia content. One of the goals within the interests of the COST Action IC1003 QUALINET and its Working Group 4 (Databases and Validation) is to create rich and internationally recognized database of content of different sorts and take the steps to make it accessible to all researchers. In this talk we will give an overview of current status of this effort with brief description of currently available databases and explanation on how these databases can be used for QoE evaluations and benchmarking. Moreover, we will focus on the Qualinet Databases online tool as Qualinet’s main resource for sharing of the datasets among Qualinet members and scientific community.

CV: Karel Fliegel (born in 1979) received his Ing. (M.Sc.) degree in electrical engineering, specialization in audiovisual technology, from the Czech Technical University in Prague, Czech Republic in 2004 and Ph.D. from the same university in 2011. Currently he holds a position of assistant professor in the Multimedia Technology Group (MMTG) at the CTU in Prague. His research interests include image processing, imaging systems, image and video compression, QoE in multimedia systems. He is a deputy leader in WG 4 (Databases and Validation) of COST Action IC1003 QUALINET.

Thursday, November 1, 2012

Preliminary CfP: Fifth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX'13)


Preliminary Call for Papers

Fifth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience
QoMEX 2013
3-5 July 2013
Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, Austria

The fifth international workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX) will bring together leading professionals and scientists interested in evaluating multimedia quality and user experience. QoMEX is the flagship workshop of the European COST action Qualinet, which serves as its technical and financial sponsor. After San Diego (2009), Trondheim (2010), Mechelen (2011), and Yarra Valley (2012), QoMEX 2013 will be held in Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, Austria.

Multimedia is a ubiquitous part of modern life; content is delivered to a wide variety of devices both fixed and mobile, the consumption environment can vary dramatically, and users increasingly demand fulfilling interaction with their media. Evaluation, both objective and subjective, of separate audio, video, or image content is well established, but there are substantial challenges in assessing users' experiences of mixed content. This is exacerbated by the diversity of devices, interfaces, consumption environments, and content prevalent in today's market. Increasingly, evaluation approaches must include psychological, perceptual, and contextual dimensions to truly represent and measure the users' experiences. Understanding and modelling how users react to and perceive content and applications will inform and improve new applications and lead to better user experiences.

Authors are invited to submit full (six pages) and/or short (two pages) papers according to the guidelines available on the conference Web site. The proceedings of will be published in IEEE Xplore (pending).

Topics of interest include but are not limited to:

  • Visual User Experience (Image/Video/Graphics): Objective and subjective quality evaluation, psychovisual modelling, quality-­centered processing, compression and transmission, QoE evaluation in HD and beyond.
  • Auditory User Experience (Speech/Audio): Psychoacoustic modelling, quality assessment of interactive speech and audio applications/interfaces, models and metrics for evaluation of spatial audio.
  • Sensory User Experiences: Novel sensory interfaces, methods for sensory user feedback, quality metrics and assessment methods for evaluation of ambient and sensory experiences.
  • QoE for Mobile Devices: device-­dependent, adaptive user interfaces, evaluating interactive experiences on mobile devices, objective/subjective evaluation of iPhone/Android multimedia applications.
  • QoE for 3D Multimedia: QoE metrics and evaluation methods for 3D audio/video, virtual, augmented and mixed realities, haptic interaction, other immersive modalities, and interactive interfaces.
  • Standardization Activities in Multimedia Quality Evaluation: Benchmarking efforts, multimedia databases/datasets of various modalities (speech, audio, video, sensory, etc.) and fidelities (quality, bitrate, etc.), testing conditions and methods (crowdsourcing), new objective metrics/models.
  • Quality Indicators and Uses: Mean Opinion Score (MOS) and alternatives, acceptance vs. satisfaction, individual impairments, link between QoS and QoE, long­‐term quality assessment, quality-based feedback and control, service­-level agreements, crowdsourcing, etc.
  • Applications and Services: Evaluating QoE in multimedia applications, e.g., games/gamification, biomedical/telemedicine, distance education, teleconferencing/telepresence, multimedia Web search/browsing, cloud-­based multimedia applications, crowdsourcing, etc.

Important Dates (tentative)

  • Special session proposals: December 12, 2012
  • Submission deadline: February 14, 2013 (full papers); March 13, 2013 (short paper)
  • Notification of acceptance: April 17, 2013
  • Camera-­ready submission: May 15, 2013

General Chair
Christian Timmerer, AAU
General Co-Chair
Patrick Le Callet, Univ. Nantes

Technical Program Co­‐Chairs
Martin Varela, VTT
Stefan Winkler, ADSC/UIUC
Tiago H. Falk, INRS­‐EMT

Special Session Chair
Raimund Schatz, FTW

Steering Committee
Loretta Anania, EC
Alan Bovik, University of Texas
Ian Burnett, RMIT
Touradj Ebrahimi, EPFL/NTNU
Khaled El-­Maleh, Qualcomm
David Geerts, IBBT ­‐ KULeuven
Lina Karam, Arizona State Univ.
Bastiaan Kleijn, VUW
Sebastian Möller, TU Berlin
Fernando Pereira, IST
Andrew Perkis, NTNU-Q2S
Amy Reibman, AT&T Labs
Peter Schelkens, IBBT – VUB
Henry Wu, RMIT

Publicity Chairs
Christian Ritz, UoW (Asia/Pacific)
Peter Reichl, UEB/Univ. Wien (Europe)
Anthony Vetro, MERL (America)

Publications Chairs
Hermann Hellwagner, AAU
Henry Wu, RMIT

Preservation Chair
Andrew Perkis, NTNU-Q2S

Friday, October 12, 2012

QUALINET Newslet Vol.2 2012: "The Quest for a Definition of Quality of Experience"



Qualinet Newslet is a newletter that appears twice a year and which is published by the COST Action IC 1003, European Network on Quality of Experience in Multimedia Systems and Services. The Newslet can be downloaded from Qualinet‘s web site http://www.qualinet.eu.

Qualinet Coordinators: Touradj Ebrahimi (EPFL), Andrew Perkis (NTNU)
Editor-in-Chief: Klaus Diepold (TUM), kldi@tum.de

Table of contents:

The Quest for a Definition of Quality of Experience
A background report on Qualinet‘s effort to define the term „Quality of Experience“
Klaus Diepold
Report: Summer School on Quality Assessment in Illmenau
Kristina Kunze 

Recent PhD theses
  • On Perception-Based Error Protection for Mobile Multimedia
    Muhammad Imran Iqbal
  • Estimating Spoken Dialog System Quality with User Models
    Klaus-Peter Engelbrecht
  • Selected Contributions on Multimedia Quality Evaluation
    Francesca De Simone
Bookshelf: Book titles related to QoE, recommended by Qualinet members for Qualinet members

Qualinet White Paper on Definitions of Quality of Experience

Preface [PDF]:

This White Paper is a contribution of the European Network on Quality of Experience in Multimedia Systems and Services, Qualinet (COST Action IC 1003, see www.qualinet.eu), to the scientific discussion about the term “Quality of Experience” (QoE) and its underlying concepts. It resulted from the need to agree on a working definition  for this term  which facilitates the communication of ideas within a multidisciplinary group, where a joint interest around multimedia communication systems exists, however approached from different perspectives. Thus, the concepts and ideas cited in this paper mainly refer to the Quality of Experience of multimedia communication systems, but may be helpful also for other areas where QoE is an issue.

The Network of Excellence (NoE) Qualinet aims at extending the notion of network-centric Quality of Service (QoS) in multimedia systems, by relying on the concept of Quality of Experience (QoE). The main scientific objective is the development of methodologies for subjective and objective quality metrics taking into account current and new trends in multimedia communication systems as witnessed by the appearance of new types of content and interactions. A substantial scientific impact on fragmented efforts carried out in this field will be achieved by coordinating the research of European experts under the catalytic COST umbrella.

The White Paper has been compiled on the basis of a first open call for ideas which was launched for the February 2012 Qualinet Meeting held in Prague, Czech Republic. The ideas were presented as short statements during  that meeting, reflecting the ideas of the persons listed under the headline “Contributors” in the previous section. During the Prague meeting, the ideas have been further discussed and consolidated in the form of a general structure of the present document. An open call for authors was issued at that meeting, to which the persons listed as “Authors” in the previous section have announced their willingness to contribute in the preparation of individual sections. For each section, a coordinating author has been assigned which coordinated the writing of that section, and which is underlined in the author list preceding each section. The individual sections were then integrated and aligned by an editing group (listed as “Editors” in the previous section), and the entire document was iterated with the entire group of authors. Furthermore, the draft text was discussed with the participants of the Dagstuhl Seminar 12181 “Quality of Experience: From User Perception to Instrumental Metrics” which was held in Schloß Dagstuhl, Germany, May 1-4 2012, and a number of changes were proposed, resulting in the present document.

As a result of the writing process and the large number of contributors, authors and editors, the document will not reflect the opinion of each individual person at all points. Still, we hope that it is found to be useful for everybody working in the field of Quality of Experience of multimedia communication systems, and most probably also beyond that field.

Any comments or suggestions should be sent to the editors:

Sebastian.Moeller@telekom.de
Patrick.Le-Callet@univ-nantes.fr
andrew@iet.ntnu.no

Please, refer to the paper as follows:
"Qualinet White Paper on Definitions of Quality of Experience (2012). European Network on Quality of Experience in Multimedia Systems and Services (COST Action IC 1003), Patrick Le Callet, Sebastian Möller and Andrew Perkis, eds., Lausanne, Switzerland, Version 1.1, June 3, 2012."
Find the .pdf here

Monday, July 9, 2012

QoMEX'12: 5 new databases for QUALINET

During QoMEX2012 we had a session on datasets which brought 5 new databases for QUALINET WG-4 briefly summarized here:

C. Keimel et al., The TUM High Definition Video Datasets
Abstract: The research on video quality metrics depends on the results from subjective testing for both the design and development of metrics, but also for their verification. As it is often too cumbersome to conduct subjective tests, freely available data sets that include both mean opinion scores and the distorted videos are becoming ever more important. While many datasets are already widely available, the majority of these data sets focus on smaller resolutions. We therefore present in this contribution the TUM high definition datasets that include videos in both 1080p25 and 1080p50, encoded with different
coding technologies and settings, H.264/AVC and Dirac, but also different presentation devices from reference monitors to homecinema projectors. Additionally a soundtrack is provided for the home-cinema scenario. The datasets are made freely available for download under a creative commons license.
Link: http://www.ldv.ei.tum.de/videolab

Y. Pitrey et al., Using Overlapping Subjective Datasets to Assess the Performance of Objective Quality Metrics on Scalable Video Coding and Error Concealment
Abstract: In this paper, four subjective video datasets are presented. The considered application is Scalable Video Coding used as an error-concealment mechanism. The presented datasets explore the relations between encoding parameters and perceived quality, under different network-impairment patterns and involve error-concealment on the decoder’s side, to simulate a complete distribution channel. The datasets share a part of common configurations which enables, in the first part of the paper, to compare the outcomes from several Single Stimulus experiments and draw interesting correspondances between different types of distortion. In the second part of the paper, we analyse the performance of three common objective quality metrics on each step of the distribution channel, to identify the possible directions to be followed in order to improve their accuracy in predicting the perceived quality.

M. Urvoy et al., NAMA3DS1-COSPAD1: Subjective video quality assessment database on coding conditions introducing freely available high quality 3D stereoscopic sequences
Abstract: Research in stereoscopic 3D coding, transmission and subjective assessment methodology depends largely on the availability of source content that can be used in cross-lab evaluations. While several studies have already been presented using proprietary content, comparisons between the studies are difficult since discrepant contents are used. Therefore in this paper, a freely available dataset of high quality Full-HD stereoscopic sequences shot with a semiprofessional 3D camera is introduced in detail. The content was designed to be suited for usage in a wide variety of applications, including high quality studies. A set of depth maps was calculated from the stereoscopic pair. As an application example, a subjective assessment has been performed using coding and spatial degradations. The Absolute Category Rating with Hidden Reference method was used. The observers were instructed to vote on video quality only. Results of this experiment are also freely available and will be presented in this paper as a first step towards objective video quality measurement for 3DTV.

M. Waltl et al., Sensory Effect Dataset and Test Setups
Abstract: Additional constituents for the representation of multimedia content gained more and more attention. For example, the amount of cinemas equipped with additional devices (e.g., ambient light, vibrating seats, wind generators, water sprayers, heater/coolers) that stimulate senses going beyond audition and vision increases. On the content side the MPEG-V standard specifies – among others – Sensory Effect Metadata (SEM) which provides means to describe sensory effects such as wind, vibration, light, etc. to be attached to audio-visual content and, thus, offering an enhanced and immersive experience for the user. However, there is a lack of a common set of test content allowing for various subjective user studies and verification across different test sites. In this paper we provide our dataset comprising a number of videos from different genres enriched with MPEG-V compliant Sensory Effect Metadata descriptions. Furthermore, we describe possible test setups using off-the-shelf hardware for conducting subjective quality assessments.

Eva Cheng et al., RMIT3DV: Pre-Announcement of a Creative Commons Uncompressed HD 3D Video Database
Abstract: There has been much recent interest, both from industry and research communities, in 3D video technologies and processing techniques. However, with the standardisation of 3D video coding well underway and researchers studying 3D multimedia delivery and users’ quality of multimedia experience in 3D video environments, there exist few publicly available databases of 3D video content. Further, there are even fewer sources of uncompressed 3D video content for flexible use in a number of research studies and applications. This paper thus presents a preliminary version of RMIT3DV: an uncompressed HD 3D video database currently composed of 31 video sequences that encompass a range of environments, lighting conditions, textures, motion, etc. The database was natively filmed on a professional HD 3D camera, and this paper describes the 3D film production workflow in addition to the database distribution and potential future applications of the content. The database is freely available online via the creative commons license, and researchers are encouraged to contribute 3D content to grow the resource for the (HD) 3D video research community.
Link: http://rmit3dv.com/

Wednesday, April 4, 2012

When QUALINET meets MPEG



The April 2012 edition of QUALINETs' Newslet provides a report on the recent tests for MPEG 3D video compression technology, which were organized and performed by Qualinet.

Additionally, it provides an overview about recent PhD theses:

  • Quality of Experience for Digital Cinema Presentation by Fitri Ranayu
  • Integral and Diagnostic Intrusive Prediction of Speech Quality by Nicolas Côté
  • Modelling Perceptual Quality and Visual Saliency for Image and Video Communications by Ulrich Engelke
  • No-Reference Image and Video Quality Assessment by Tomás Brandão
  • Video Quality Prediction for Video over Wireless Access Networks (UMTS and WLAN) by Asiya Khan


The QUALINET Newslet is available here! Any comments, feedback are highly appreciated. You might also join our Facebook or LinkedIn groups.

Qualinet Newslet is a newletter that appears twice a year and which is published by the COST Action IC 1003, European Network on Quality of Experience in Multimedia Systems and Services. The Newslet can be downloaded from Qualinet‘s web site http://www.qualinet.eu.

Qualinet Coordinators: Touradj Ebrahimi (EPFL), Andrew Perkis (NTNU)
Editor-in-Chief: Klaus Diepold - Technische Universität München (kldi@tum.de)
Produktion: Henrik Löhnig (henrik@loehnig.com)

Friday, April 22, 2011

QoX: What is it really?

ETSI TC on Human Factors
This article provides a very good article around QoX where X stands for anything, specifically it encompasses Quality of Service (QoS), Class of Service (CoS), Grade of Service (GoS), Quality of Resilience (QoR), and - last but not least - Quality of Experience (QoE).

At the beginning the article provides an overview about different QoS definitions and application/traffic/service classes as defined by various standard-developing organizations (SDOs) such as ITU-T, IETF, 3GPP, and IEEE. Also an attempt to perform the mapping between service classes defined within various approaches is given. Additionally, no so well-known terms such as Grade of Service (GoS) and Quality of Resilience are described.

The article provides a good definition of Quality of Experience (QoE), its various dimensions, and how it relates to the other QoX terms and to a general model which defines three levels of QoS: intrinsic (network performance; ITU-T E.800), perceived (QoS; ITU-T G.1000), and assessed (QoE; ITU-T P.10). It is concluded that QoE is somewhere on the border between perceived and assessed which I tend to agree. Interestingly, the article points out the various dimensions of QoE including environmental, psychological, and sociological factors such as user expectation, experience with similar services, opinions of others (i.e., social networks), pricing policies, location-based factors, etc. Also, QoE measures and metrics, classification of QoE evaluation methods, and the relationship between QoE and intrinsic quality parameters are highlighted.

Finally, the article is concluded with open issues clusters into scientific, technical, economical, and legal challenges.

In particular, I like:
  • the introduction into the terminology and how QoX is realized in various SDOs (ITU-T, IETF, 3GPP, IEEE);
  • the definition of QoE and its variants; and
  • the challenges at the end.
However, I'm missing vital, novel, future applications in/around QoX, otherwise one might think that the aim of this research is providing a solution/fix to current issues only (btw. that's fine, don't get me wrong ;-)

Citation:
Stankiewicz, R.; Cholda, P.; Jajszczyk, A.; , "QoX: What is it really?," Communications Magazine, IEEE , vol.49, no.4, pp.148-158, April 2011
doi: 10.1109/MCOM.2011.5741159